<p>Held in the custody of childhood is a locked chest; the adolescent$$$ by one means or another$$$ tries to open it. The chest is opened: inside$$$ there is nothing. So he reaches a conclusion: the treasure chest is always like this$$$ empty. From this p

<p>Held in the custody of childhood is a locked chest; the adolescent$$$ by one means or another$$$ tries to open it. The chest is opened: inside$$$ there is nothing. So he reaches a conclusion: the treasure chest is always like this$$$ empty. From this point on$$$ he gives priority to this assumption of his rather than to his reality. In other words$$$ he is now a grown-up. Yet was the chest really empty? Wasn't there something vital$$$ something invisible to the eye$$$ that got away at the very moment it was opened?</p>